I, every month, buy the majority of the Harlequin Blaze titles that are published. I read other lines as well, but the Blaze books are by far my favorite as they generally include snappy dialogue, women who are trying to find their own path (even if that path, per force, leads them straight to some hunky guy), and some genuinely erotic sex.
However. A couple of things have come up lately that I just can’t let pass without comment.
This is from Slow Hands by Leslie Kelly.
After the slurred voice behind her got loud enough for Jake to hear it over the crowd, he leaped to his feet, turned around and thrust an angry finger into the drunk man’s face. “Didn’t your mother ever teach you to keep your eyes to your own damn self and your fat mouth closed?” he snapped.
The foul-mouthed fan, a heavyset, sweaty guy with red cheeks and beer-scented breath, rose, too, swaying on his feet. “Hey, man, she’s hot.”
Maddy, the main character, assures herself that her shirt isn’t lowcut and that she doesn’t have anything to be ashamed of. The drunk guy calls her hot again.
Despite the crudeness she’d heard from the stranger before Jake had caught on and launched at him, she remained more annoyed than offended. Leave it to a breast-obsessed little boy wearing men’s triple-X sized clothing to ruin her lovely afternoon.
The men trade more insults, Maddy realizes Jake is seriously angry, the drunk guy asks her if her boobs are real. She tells him his favorite show must be Girls Gone Wild and, in much fancier words because she is that kind of woman, calls him a pig.
Now, the conflation of men with pigs has always been an interesting one to me. It’s a REALLY layered comparison, especially if you know anything about pigs. But I’m just going to ask what the fuck makes the author and the editors at Harlequin think it is appropriate to run with the big, sweaty fat dude stereotype? Why mention it at all? Sure, the dude could be a big, fat, sweaty guy – that has happened to me in real life. But he could also be one of those thin dudes who never ever looks wrinkled. I’ve been heckled by them before, too. Nevermind the incredible and obvious disparity between “heavyset” and “mens triple-X sized clothing” because, Ms. Kelly (if that is indeed, your real name! *laugh*), you obviously don’t know anymore about fat men, their bodies, and their clothing sizes than is known by the general public about women, their weights, and THEIR clothing sizes.
*eyeroll*
But it gets better.
And by better, I mean worse.
“I can’t believe I’m eating like this.”
They’d been munching on chicken wings and a mountain of nachos. And to his surprise, Maddy had opted for beer, sharing a half-pitcher with him, instead of some sweet, girlie drink. She seemed relaxed. if not outright laughing, she at least smiled more than once.
“Don’t be too hard on yourself. I don’t think they even serve salads here, unless they’re topped with deep-fried chicken and a mountain of cheese.”
One fine, delicate brow arched and she stared at him with quiet reproach, though a hint of a smile lurked on her beautiful mouth. “What are you suggesting, Jake? That I should only be eating salads?”
I get that Ms. Kelly is going for some sort of realistic representation of the way women interact with food. I get that, honest. But are you SERIOUS? I’m glad he’s surprised she’s eating like a real person. But come on. Do we really need more women in fiction who self-flagellate in front of their dinner companions about what the hell they are eating? This is a romance novel. There are only 200+/- pages to make me have a good time. This? Is not a good time.
But, oh, it goes on!
He backpedaled, holding up a quick, defensive hand. Damn, how could guys avoid these basic traps women always set out for them? “No way.” Grinning, he added, “Just seems like the only things my sisters ever ordered. God forbid one of them should ever have taken a bite out of a hamburger, especially if one of their boyfriends was around.”
“It’s a female thing.” She sighed heavily, as if accepting something that was inevitable. “Not just the instinct to watch what we eat, so we can look like what all the media images tell us we should look like. There’s also a need to eat lightly in front of men, as if we need to assure them we’re on top of things and will never gain weight.”
“When secretly you’re all dying for wings and nachos?”
She licked her lips, them smacked them together before reaching for another. “Yes. Any of your sisters married?”
“The oldest, with three kids-twin boys and a girl. And Blair, who’s a year older than me, is engaged.”
“Uh-huh. Watch her at the wedding reception. She’s going to bite into the first piece of cake she’s had since she decided he was the one, and will look like she’s already had her first orgasm of the night.”
First, there is the equation of food with orgasms, with sex. Eating cake is like having an orgasm. In our society with its mixed signals about sex (Men should have tons of it! Women should be virgins!), this sort of thing says a lot. Self-denial is good because food/sex is bad! You are in control and “on top of things” if you never let them see you eat!
Not to mention – except I’m totally mentioning it – the utterly disgusting perpetuation of the women-don’t-eat-in-front-of-men paradigm. There is another page and a half of this conversation, all about how if it were a real date she’d only order water (with lemon, a natural diuretic!) and a bread stick.
Did someone stet the deletion of this entire bit of dialog at the last minute? Did it completely escape everyone’s notice the way this dude is NOT a virgin (in fact, Maddy thinks he is a male prostitute – oh, plot device) but he only mentions this behavior in his sisters and Maddy still manages, even while acknowledging the outrageous standards of the media, to establish her superiority to those other women? Because women need to compete with each other even more! Men are a limited resource!
Here’s the bit that really grosses me out:
He risked a quick, appreciative look across the table at her curvy figure [TR says - which is a euphemism that means she thinks she's fat but really she's, like, a size 8], so incredibly sexy in her hot pink top. “By the way, in my opinion you don’t have a thing to worry about.”
“Ha. I have huge breasts, short legs, what my father likes to call my late mother’s ‘childbearing hips’ and a big backside.”
As if any man would complain about a single one of those things? Was she for real? “Honey from where I’m sitting, you are just about perfect.”
“From where you’re sitting, you can’t see the extra fifteen pounds that couldn’t be removed from my body by a plastic surgeon using an industiral Shop-Vac instead of a liposuction machine.”
He barked a quick laugh. “You’re not going to get an agreement from any man alive on that score, Madeline Turner. You are shaped exactly the way awoman should be shaped.
Noooooooooooooooooooooo! Not the “real women have curves” argument! The one that totally ignores that women come in all sorts of shapes and sizes (and biological gender assignments, for that matter) and is totally vile!
Yes, that is exactly where this wound up.
Okay, let me give you a basic lesson in dignity and respect for other people. When someone pays you a compliment, you say thank you. You certainly don’t tell them they are blind to the extra fifteen pounds that so disfigure your frame!
*headdesk*
I’d also like to note that if that self-description is in any way accurate, Harlequin, you hella need to rethink your cover model. The lanky, flat-chested woman with no visible rear-end at all.
Like I said, I get that Ms. Kelly is trying to portray the body angst that women of all shapes and sizes feel. I just think she can do it without a) perpetuating negative stereotypes about fat men and b) having her heroine disparage the body her sexual partner finds beautiful as though he is some kind of fool. I think, in fact, the last thing we need is yet another example of women who hate their bodies.
Show me a woman who is in love with her body. A woman who is confident and not afraid of being naked, who doesn’t have to be coaxed in front of a mirror when she is naked to see why her partner desires her. Show me a woman who DOES have body issues but who knows that the mill of our culture is grinding her to grist and is fighting to escape it. Show me a woman who doesn’t like her body but wants to without some random epiphany that comes from being validated by a dude.
Not more of this crap that does nothing but give lip service to the unrealistic standard of beauty before utterly caving in to it.
Note: Tomorrow, an excerpt from Jill Shalvis’ Flashpoint where they go beyond having a heroine who has body issues and straight into straight up fat jokes! Also, a bit of ranting about the What I Did On My Summer Vacation compilation book that opens with Thea Divine writing about the fattening qualities of fast food sex and how her character needs a fast, she needs to go on The Guy Diet!


23 Comments
This is a bit off on a tangent, but I recently picked up a bunch of early 70s gothics at a flea market. I’m reading one of them now, by Marilyn Ross — who also wrote all the Dark Shadows novels! — and what I’m struck by is that I’m a chapter in and all I know of the heroine’s appearance is that she’s pretty and has red hair.
It’s oddly refreshing.
Do you have any recommendations for Harlequin Blaze novels that don’t trip up your enjoyments with exchanges between the characters like this? One of the main things that keeps me from trying to enjoy Harlequin romance novels is all the gender stereotyping that goes on. (Another example: the guy inevitably has more sexual experience than the woman.) What are your favorites?
This is a romance novel. There are only 200+/- pages to make me have a good time. This? Is not a good time.
Heh. This is why I don’t read romances that aren’t either by an author I know or that I’ve seen reviewed by someone I trust. Although even then I sometimes hit up the kind of stuff you’re talking, where it’s like, who was asleep at the wheel, anyhow?
Even more annoying than the ones with heroines who think they are fat but aren’t are the ones with heroines who’re fat but always end up skinny by the end. True love is the most effective diet known to man, I guess. *sigh*
You know, no matter how right you are about the rest of it, it’s at THIS point
“Damn, how could guys avoid these basic traps women always set out for them?”
that I throw the book across the room.
I am sooooo running out of patience for male BS On many, many fronts. No matter WHAT size it comes in. (And it always seems to come in Size Whiny, you notice?)
Faaaaaast.
/ends off-topic rant with award-winning scowl’n'pout
The story sort of left me wondering at the sharing a half pitcher of beer.
A half pitcher?
What sort of wimpy thing is that?
My spouse and I share a whole pitcher, and often two pitchers!
I read an interview in the Fatosphere recently about a romance author who features larger heroines in a positive light. (My library doesn’t carry her–yet!) Her name is Pat Ballard and she might be a nice counterweight to this annoyance. I haven’t read her yet, so I can’t give a personal opinion.
I do like romance novels too, so I’ll be interested to see which novels you like, and check out my library for ‘em.
I love romance novels too, but am continually irritated by all the fat stereotypes and put-downs in them. I will stop buying an author if I see a lot of that happening in her stuff.
You’d think the editors and publishers would GET that a lot of their readers ARE fat, and that they are alienating them in a major way, wouldn’t you?
Grrrr.
In the romances I’ve read (granted, not very many), there have been two general types of heroine – one who thinks she’s fat when really she just has big breasts, and one who stresses about how flat-chested she is when really she has a perfect skinny body. (When these characters eat more than a salad, the author often tries to excuse it by reminding us that she’s not fat.) Moving into chick lit, there’s sometimes a heroine who is a few pounds away from thin, and loses those pounds as soon as she stops overeating to escape her problems. I’d really like to see some variety.
Also, it seems like in books – particularly romances – where the heroine has body image issues, the author tells us the heroine’s body is okay by telling us the hero approves of it. How about letting the heroine decide her body is good the way it is, instead of having the hero do it for her?
Can you do these ALL THE TIME, please?
As a grad student I had a friend whose primary research was a comprehensive survey of the romance-novel forumla, specializing in the Harlequins, which she then criticized from a radical feminist perspective. It was fascinating and I’ve so often wished I knew someone doing the same thing with regards to weight and body image and the language used around both.
Excellent post, man!
This is part of why I don’t read romance novels. I’ll just stick with my sci-fi/fantasy, thanks.
Thanks for reading this, you guys! I will compile a little list of the books that I have been enjoying lately that don’t go out of their way to insult the fat and/or reinforce body image issues.
Lesley, I have read so many of these damn books at this point that I can expound for hours. Your friend’s project sounds FASCINATING. Maybe I ought to put some more effort into formalizing the conclusions that I keep drawing. If I have a talent for anything when it comes to literature, it is devouring a giant mass of it and seeing how it all is the same.
SL, if you think this sort of thing doesn’t happen in sci-fi/fantasy, you are dead wrong! It isn’t usually quite this blatant because the characters usually have different, less-body oriented goals, but there is just as much stuff going on to reinforce the status quo when it comes to beauty standards. Sci-fi and fantasy both have their own tropes that are inescapable.
Things is…as a fiction writer, I tend to side with the writers right to write what they want. I figure, if you don’t like it, don’t read it.
As for sci-fi and fantasy, yeah…most the heroines are probably thin (nothing wrong with that), but I have yet to see much talk about what women eat, etc in the sci-fi/fantasy books I have read.
Anonymous, your assertion that “a lot of their readers ARE fat” is just falling into the stereotype of romance readers being sad, lonely women sitting around eating bonbons and dreaming of the men they can’t have. A lot of their readers are READERS, are just as varied as the general populace, and I think that’s the more salient point – romance readers are no longer exclusively conservative women of a certain age looking for a particular brand of escapism. As such, it would behoove the writers to avoid stereotypes of all kinds, but when you’re only given 200 pages to tell a complete story, it’s far too tempting to rely on cultural shorthand to get your points across.
I read a lot of historical romance, and it almost never mentions food. I think I prefer the avoidance.
And the whole sex/food thing is so wound into our culture that in high school, when I first swore off dieting, I was simultaneously a prude (because I’d never had a boyfriend) and a slut (probably because I enjoyed food and made no secret of it.). Confused the hell out of my teenaged self, but as I get more involved in SA and feminism, it makes more and more sense.
SL, as a writer of a whole lot of different stuff, I think writers bear responsibility for their words. None of us are writing in a vacuum. Also, we are not writing and hoping that no one will ever read us! The goal of publishing is to have readers. Saying that a reader just shouldn’t read your book is pretty expressly counterproductive. Writers can absolutely write what they want. But if readers don’t respond well to it, then we aren’t doing our job as writers which is, ultimately, the communication of a story.
As for sci-fi and fantasy, you don’t have to dwell explicitly on body images to perpetuate and reinforce the impossible beauty standard. there IS a problem when every single heroine is thin. There is absolutely something wrong with that. There are more type of people than thin, white women, even in space/faux medival times.
Baconsmom, I actually read that as a reference to the way, statistically, more than 50% of women in the US wear a size 14 or larger! But I definitely agree with you that romance readers are an incredibly diverse group and it would be well for the writers of these books to remember that.
I haven’t noticed a massive decline of readers of sci-fi/fantasy due to the heroine being thin. I’m not thin. All of my female heroines *are* thin. I don’t believe there is anything wrong with that. It’s my world that I created and frankly, if I ever attempt to publish any of my fiction, I highly doubt that I’m going to lose readership due to my thin heroines. Then again, I also don’t have my heroines worrying about what they’re eating, or what they’re wearing.
SL – But you actually might lose readers…a personal example: I love Charles DeLint and the way he crafts urban fantasy, but I absolutely detest the way all his women are elfin waifs. The idea that there was never any diversity to the way he described the physical aspects of his female characters just totally put me off and I won’t read him anymore. I have a similar reaction to Laurel Hamilton…I was bugged by the need for everyone in her novels to be perfect and beautiful long before her novels devolved into only sex.
I am very glad you are writing about this. I wish I could remember some of the romances that I loved with curvy women that were positive, but I never hang onto them. Have you ever checked out the “Smart Bitches Who Love Trashy Novels” website. It’s awesome and it’s coversnarks make me laugh.
I can remember exactly ONE romance novel that had a fat heroine, and that’s Sherrilyn Kenyon’s ‘Night Play’. Granted, Bride’s got some body/self-esteem issues, but it’s damned refreshing to read about a heroine who is a size 18 (and not just a size 8 with a DD cup bra) who has some damned hot sex.
SL, my comment to you got a little out of hand in the length department and is now its own post.
ginag, there is a Harlequin Blaze that I can remember – but I can’t remember the name of it. It featured a character that I swear, even though specifics were never given, was actually kind of fat. I am reasonably sure I still have it somewhere but I have hundreds of these books so finding it might be tricky. The books in my house are not well-organized, unfortunately. Maybe I’ll put out a call for help on one of the romance novel communities. It was about a woman who was an artist – I believe she was a body painter. There was a character who painted bodies like candy and I’m not entirely sure this wasn’t that woman.
Anyway, she dressed in bold colors and styles and utterly seduced this previously kind of stodgy guy with her confidence, sense of freedom, and boobs.
I’m not thin. All of my female heroines *are* thin.
Can I ask why?
Personally, I don’t avoid books where the heroines are thin (because then I’d be more or less stuck not reading) but I would go out of my way to buy a book where a fat heroine was presented in a positive way.
I was rereading a Heyer today and she had a fat character who was a disgusting and randy person – however, she also had a fat character who was personable and kind (both fairly minor characters). I know she’s got another one where my favorite character is fat, and at least one of her heroines is overweight by her culture’s standards (Civil Contract) – although that one Heyer was deliberately flipping cliches I think.
I’ve read other romances of Heyer’s era and even then heroines were usually thin, but it did seem more common in the first half of the 20th century to have positive fat characters than I’ve seen in more current romances. Then again, I was once reading what was essentially a romance printed in 1914 where the heroine is repeatedly described as thin and delicate – but in the drawings in the story it’s clear that, by today’s standards, she is *clearly* overweight, and toward the obese end of overweight to boot. I remember next to nothing about the story but the illustrations stick with me…
I have mixed feelings about Jennifer Weiner’s Good In Bed, but one thing I really like about it is how the main character learns to celebrate and love her (size 16) body by the end of the book, and that’s seen as the real happy ending. I think that book put me on the road to fat acceptance, though there were other parts of it I didn’t like as much.
(It’s more chick-lit than straight up romance, but I think it still fits in the discussion.)
Have you read Jennifer Crusie’s book Bet Me? The heroine isn’t fat (her dress size is given as 10 or 12 or something) but she thinks she is, and her mother hassles her about her weight all the time. The hero keeps trying to convince her she’s beauiful and she keeps discounting it and/or believing it and then having to go deal with her family and losing the faith – but clearly eating what she likes & being happy about her body are part of the overall happy ending.
I tend to assume the people in modern-setting books are all about average, unless it says otherwise, so when all the sudden you it says that the heroine has hipbones that stick out or something, it really jars me out of the story.
I want to know why the author decided to waste X-number of pages on sermonizing about something that’s not even relevant to the plot.
Christi, I wrote a review of sorts over on my blog (http://rhonwyyn.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/good-in-bedgood-in-bed). I haven’t read the sequel, but from the summaries I’ve read, it sounds like it’s more about her daughter’s issue with finding out about her father than it is about Cannie and her weight/size. I could be totally wrong. Honestly, though, if it’s about the former, I don’t really want to read it. That’s just not a topic that interests me. The weight issues do, though.
One Trackback
[...] Rotund has a great entry on body issues and how women are represented in romance novels. I personally don’t read romance novels, and typically I’ve only read so-called [...]